Interesting Reddit post by an English-Indian man

21 11 2016




Experience with Ms.T of the woodstock generation

1 01 2016

Recently I’ve befriend an older lady(referred to as Ms. T) from the Woodstock generation in her 70s, whom I met from class. On our second meeting she came to me, wanting my contact info, saying we have more in common than I realize. She proceeded to invite me to her home to have tea, and asked me to train her in some internal martial arts. She treated me like a son she never had.

 

I asked Ms. T why she’s so eager to befriend me, she replied she simply felt a good vibe from me. it turned out throughout her life she spent with a lot of religious groups including japanese zen buddhists, orthodox christians, hasidic jews, and Suffi Muslims. she claimed she had a sense from me that i am “spiritually inclined”, that I will be a good friend.

 

This experience has baffled me a bit as most younger women of this generation generally have a bad vibe from me, seeing me as “creepy”, making them “uncomfortable” just by being around them, Ms. T felt the complete opposite.   It is very clear that Ms. T and the modern American woman have drastically different set of values when they are appraising me. Ultimately what can we say about the culture today verses the culture from Ms. T’s generation?

 





My father is right in retrospect, Franklin might be wrong in some cases, some thoughts…

22 06 2014

As stated before coming from a first generation Asian American background, the older generation seldom want to hear what us younger generation has to say. In regards to man incel problems that plague the Asian/Indian men community in the west, my father gave the typical answer I expect him to say: “as long as you have money you can do everything you please, as long as you make money all your problems are solvable.” What he fail to answer is that incels in the west typically have an aptitude for math and science, many of us work in the field of Engineering(such as the indian roomate of 3rd world hero) so money isn’t a problem then why is it that the same decent men who make money remain incel?

 

In retrospect, after some analysis of what Franklin said and what my father said, they are indeed still correct. The major difference between the choosing criteria of women in Feminist vs Non-Feminist countries, is their sexual promiscuity. Women in feminist countries tend to value looks and swagger at young age thus will ride the cock carousel with the tall muscular jockeys and the handsome badboys. After they get pumped and dumped when they are older they will start to value men with money more. At the same time the women from non-feminist societies will value men with money from the beginning, and they will not ride the cock-carousel of handsome bad boys.

 

Such choosing criteria can be seen in Asian women, where they will typically look for men that DOESN’T have masculine qualities but at the same time HAVE money (the effeminate rich man) so they can manipulate those men and use them for their money. Essentially they will value money from the effeminate man (long term) above the hot sex with the jockey (short term), where as their western counter part will choose the complete opposite.

 

As any reasonable individual can see, money is important in both feminist and non-feminist countries. The bad news here, is that there are selective few incels who are in non-STEM fields, and would less likely to have money, thus making them bad choice for mates even in non-feminist countries. Franklin advocate incels to go abroad as most incels have money due to their aptitude in math and science, it does not work for incels that don’t excel in those areas. 





“failure” of Eastern values in western culture

22 04 2014

It is not a mystery that Asian/Indian men in the west struggle the most in modern dating, and I do not think it is a coincidence that Asian/Indian men are also over-represented in high education particularly in the STEM fields.

It seems obvious to me, that those Asian/Indian men who did not struggle in the west, are typically adopted or completely westernized (twinkie/banana). Those who came from traditional families typically have to go AGAINST what their parents tell them to find sexual success. The more the son obeyed the traditionalist parents, the less successful with women they are(unless they are physically attractive enough to stand out)

the asian logic of study hard in STEM field, get a good job, make money, then women will be naturally attracted to you does not work in the west as due to feminism, women no longer depend on men for economic reliance, as they can depend on the state to provide while they fuck bad boys. Men are no longer valued on there providing abilities.

The typical obedient Asian kid would be spending time studying Chemistry, physics, and calculus, preparing for their SATs and AP exams while his peers are getting high with friends, trying out for the track team, deciding who to ask for a date to the school dance, or who to hook up with after school.

According to Dr. Brian G Gilmartin, Skills with the opposite sex takes a life time to accumulate. if you did not accumulate the skills early in life it is less likely for you to obtain skill later.

are Asian parents wrong to bring their values here? Are the twinkies/bananas right to rebel?





The Art of Whore

19 04 2014

The Art of Whore: Why Betas Marry Leftovers by Leap of a Beta” Originally Posted on May 21 at 12 AM as a gift to you from Professor Mentu

Bottom-feeding scum sucking Cory Catfish, thy name is beta.

Thank you for cleaning the algae and fecal remains of bigger, stronger, faster fish from the pond of society. You are the homeless guy I give my leftovers to, packaged in a glossy takeout box from a restaurant you could never afford. You, beta, are the malleable putty that fills the karmic gap between what she wants and what she deserves. If ever there was an exultant scavenger, a happy beggar, or a willful fool foraging through the rotting leftovers of discarded femdom like a soon-to-be-roadkill raccoon, it’s you. Thank you for your service.

  • A man with options would never put a ring on a anger that’s been wrapped around a dozen cocks.
  • A man with options would never pay the ultimate price of commit for a born again virgin fucktoy.
  • A man with options would never let his son’s first home be a womb that has seen more trafic than I-35 during rush hour.
  • A man with options would never allow the first kiss his newborn son receives to come from lips that have hosted lotsa cocka.
  • A man with options would never let his son’s first nourishment come from breasts that can be viewed on any number of cell phone cameras.
  • A man with options would never let his son’s first throne be the lap of a woman who has been passed around like a blunt at a frat party.
  • A man with options would never be a dickstand for a woman who squandered her youth and beauty on the men who respected her the least.
  • A man with options would never consider being the last man standing at the end of the long line of conquests she racked up while being the Grand Marshal of a rather impressive cock parade.

Do men with options pass up on whores because of religious ethics? Sometimes. Do men with options pass up on whores because a promiscuous lifestyle stunts a woman’s ability to bond with her husband and children?

I reckon. Do men with options avoid committing to whores because of social pride? I certainly hope so. But there’s one gloriously simple, easy to define and even easier to defend reason why men with options do not marry whores: They don’t have to.

Beta males have four primary deficits when it comes to making sound relationship decisions, which leads them to permanently settle down with Gangbang Barbie after the rest of us are done with her. The Art of Whore: Why Betas Marry Leftovers

1) Their inability to identify a whore/slut due to lack of experience.

Thanks to a lack of experience with women, betas believe that a whore is a filthy girl who will sleep with anybody. When their pea-sized brains conjure up the idea of a whore, they imagine a woman who stops a red light, sees a man waiting at a bus stop, and has an unbelievable urge to put the car in park and go bang him. Betas think a whore is a girl who goes out to the bar four nights per week and bangs four different men. Dead wrong.

With this deffnition of whore, it’s no wonder betas defend women – they never see a whore. But in reality, whores are selective. In fact, they’re probably the most selective women in the mating market.

The Art of Whore is displayed by women who harness their sexual power and unleash it with stunning accuracy on the men at the top of the social hierarchy – often in a serially monogamous fashion (with a few “mistakes” along the way for good measure).

Wake up, beta. That nice girl in your social group who has a different boyfriend every three or four months on average, has casual hookups on vacation, and has that “special friend” who keeps her warm at night between boyfriends is a two-bit worthless whore. “But wait, Mentu! Most girls do that these days!” Now you’re getting it. Walk with me.

Whore is not about a number; it’s about her decision-making abilities and the value she assigns to sexual congress. Women are the gatekeepers of sex, so the men she lets through the gates – regardless of how many or how few – tells you everything you need to know about her relationship value. I don’t care if she’s slept with 5 men or 50 men; her sexual past reveals her relationship worth and ability to make sound decisions.

Take for instance a healthy 28 year old woman. In my experience, your average American woman has had anywhere between 12 and 23 sexual partners by this time. Let’s call it an average of 17. A reasonable man would not assume that all 17 men dumped her, or that she dumped all 17; a myriad of reasons, situations, emotions and circumstances led her to this place. So what does this tell us?

It tells us that a number of men just had fun with her (promiscuity), she had to bounce a number of men after she opened her womb to them (bad decision making), and a number of men sampled a mini relationship with her for a while and decided not to keep her around (low value).

So, beta, which of those three traits – promiscuity, bad decision making, and low value – would you like to have instilled in your children? Which of those traits do you believe will make her an excellent wife? Which of these traits do you believe will not increase your likelihood of being cheated on or landing in divorce court? Can you see yourself waking up in the morning, rolling over, looking at her and thinking “Thank God I’ve committed to a worthless whore who has a 15 year long track record of making bad decisions?” Of course not. But this leads us to the 2nd primary defficit of the beta:

2) Their susceptibility to shaming language.

Betas cower in fear and quickly acquiesce when confronted with shaming language. “I’m not like that anymore”, “You can’t judge me”, and “A woman’s worth is not decided by her sexual past” seem to be the go-to responses for women who find themselves in the awkward situation of justifying why they’ve banged more men than can be comfortably seated in a small Family Diner.

For the record, the correct responses are “yes you are”, “yes I can”, and when it comes to marriage, “yes it is.” Does promiscuity make her a bad employee? Nope. Does it make her a bad friend? Nah. Does it make her an evil person who is likely to knock over a liquor store and steal a getaway car? Not at all.

Does a promiscuous past mean she can’t do good in the community and make profound societal contributions? Of course not. Does it make her a high-risk marriage partner and a shitty role model for your children in a society built around the family unit instead of the “it takes a village” approach?

According to the church, the Centers for Disease Control, your buddy who laughs at you behind your back, biological evidence, gender anthropologists, a growing number of psychologists, your own gut instincts, and yours truly, yes it most certainly does.

It always amazes me how betas will agree with a woman that her past education reveals her dedication to scholarly pursuits, her past work experience reveals her quest to improve her business acumen, her past payment history reveals her credit worthiness, her past workout routine reveals her desire for a healthy lifestyle, and her past volunteer efforts reveal her heart of gold, but her past sexual habits reveal absolutely nothing. That, my beta friend, is The Art of Whore.

If you buy in to that shit, you deserve whatever ill may befall you.

3) Their unnatural dedication to the female definition of “fairness.”

Here’s where the rubber meets the road for bottom-feeding beta males.

We’’ve all heard the statement “It’s not fair that a woman who sleeps around is a whore, but men who sleep around are studs.” There’s been more than enough digital ink spilled on this topic in the manosphere, so I won’t go in to it. Everybody knows it’s easy to be a whore, but hard to be a player – and society doesn’t award trophies for doing easy shit. It’s not a double standard; it’s two different standards for two different genders with two different barriers to sexual entry and two different sets of risk factors.

But forget that for a moment. For the sake of this article, let’s assume that the woman’s statement is true. That’s right, let’s assume for a moment that there is an unfair evil double standard afoot.

What the fuck do you care?

If you’re a beta male looking for marriage, it’s not your job to be fair – this is your life, not a general assembly at the UN. Your job is to and the best mother for your children that you possibly can.

It doesn’t matter if you banged 5,000 women on camera last night; you need to and the most competent, capable, qualifed, trustworthy, physically and emotionally stable woman you possibly can to help raise your children.

Let her worry about your past and whether or not she thinks you’re qualifed to be their father, and you focus on her qualifcations.

Come to think of it, that’s actually quite fair, wouldn’t you say?

4) Their lack of options.

When it comes to liaising with whores, Alphas are volunteers, and betas are voluntolds. The Art of Whore is not lost on the Alpha male – they volunteer to use them for what they’re good for, then pass them of to betas who are voluntold to put a ring on their anger.

Beta, your lack of options is making you weak, distorting your judgment, and may eventually land your pansy ass in divorce court. The Art of Whore is real, and women work to better their craft every day. What have you done lately besides make excuses for her?

Women proficient in The Art of Whore get what they want: A decade-long ride on the cock carousel with no consequences, then a willing hapless beta with open arms, an open mind, and an open wallet to cushion their landing and finance their recovery.

As long as you’re standing there ready, willing and able, I honestly can’t say that I blame them for taking you up on your generous offer.

This entry was posted in The Empty Halls of University of Man and tagged Masculine Frame, Shame the Beta.





do men have inherent desire to seek validation from women?

11 03 2014

Building off of the previous post on the masculinity post. In many “men’s discussions” which ever that involves getting money or building muscles and fitness, it’s all part of “game” in pulling women. As we all know, the individuals that seeks the most validation from women are gamers/PUAs. In many of those “men” discussions, “game” seems to become the core of masculinity in our culture today.

I have noticed similar sentiments in myself, that when I don’t get validation from women I instinctive feel inadequate, and when I do get validation from women I feel good from it.

So my final question here is, do men have inherent desire to seek validation from women?





A question concerning modern dating is asked.

15 02 2014

I am wondering what you guys think:

Why is it that a lot of women who put up with physical and emotional abuse from bad boys have no trouble telling nice guy off for the slightest transgression?

Response from a woman:

With the ‘bad boy’ she is operating within a dysfunctional family dynamic — generally such a woman will have learned patterns of abusive relationships within her upbringing.  This would most likely be how she has observed her father treating her mother and girls within the family.  She will feel comfortable with this sort of behaviour, as bad as it might be.  It is what she knows and her ordinary systems of coping (numbing out or compartmentalising are examples) will click into place whenever it happens.

As crazy as it might seem, a ‘nice’ guy treating this woman well with cause her to feel distressed and panicky.  She does not have any emotional mechanisms for handling him.  She might be thinking: ‘If I trust him, will he hurt me when I let down my guard?  I better not let him see my vulnerability; I’ll attack him before he hurts me.” 

Being able to trust someone when your life experience tells you that this is dangerous is daunting.  A man dating this sort of woman needs to be patient and tolerate (to a point) her bad behaviour.  By not reacting to it she will eventually realise that he is not like the problem man in her upbringing.  She will start to let down her guard — well, hopefully she will.  It depends on the degree of her insecurity.  Undoing abusive situations is complex and can take years.

Be compassionate towards her.  She is reacting to a bad history, not the nice guy.  The reason why she can lash out in the west is because women’s rights are much stronger than in the developing world.  She feels safer to act out towards a man.

In a more conservative society women will suppress expressions of anger because it is too dangerous to do otherwise (bad things, all the way to murder, happen in retailiation to a woman’s anger in places like India). If a man in the West did such a thing he will be censored and legal action taken.








RICEGAME

Journey into Masculinity & Self-Discovery

Boy DOESN'T Meet Girl

Welcome to the dark ages of male-female relations.

The Human Mating

Empiricism is the path of the knowledge

Third World Hero

my weight loss progress to get a girl

MICHAEL FORMAN AUTHOR

Neo-noir-erotica to get between the bone and flesh.

rantsofanincel

This is a site dedicated to men who suffer incel/TFL

THELONEWOLFTRAVELER

Travel, sex, and dating blog, tourist, non confrmist, adventure seeker, culture explorer, sex and dating travel blog, Asian pioneer, Asian Manosphere, Asian Pride Website, A kickass blog for the Asian man, Author of #1 Amazon best seller "Get Laid in Hong Kong. A Travel Guide for the Western Asian Male."

M3

I will face my fear and let it pass through me.

The Sweat Project

A Personal Fitness Journey

Prego and the Loon

Pregnant and Dealing With Domestic Violence

Love Is My Only Addiction

Love Can Be Digested By All

Playing the Devil's Advocate

Upholding Dissent and Skepticism

CoAlphaAntiModernistIncelBlogger

Anti-modernist, anti-feminist, anti-liberal, anti-MRA, anti-seduction pro-patriarchy/reactionary, pro-Islam blog on incel, love-shyness, decline of the Western civilization/modern culture, concept of coalpha men/society and life in general

Freedom From The Gynocracy

There is no personal solution to systemic problems, and feminism/women is a systemic problem.

No 'FRIES' for 365

- My Journey: A Blog About Fitness, Nutrition, & Overall Health -

The WordPress.com Blog

The latest news on WordPress.com and the WordPress community.